Although I've been in San Jose
State for two semesters, this semester is the first semester I'm taking all
upper division courses. I won't say this is a tough time for me, but it's indeed
a challenge semester. There were many writings and presentations throughout the
whole semester. In every way because of these homework assignments, I feel they
really helped me to understand my weakness and strength in academic skills. I
learned that my presentation skills, as I expected, are fairly strong though
there are still rooms for improvement. I learned that my writing skill really
need to improve to catch on the college writing level. I also learned that
there aren't that many Asian students that chose this major, which gives me an
advantage among Asian people; because I not only know how to do, but also know
how to present and explain. Also, after this semester, I know I've chosen the
right path and major for my future. I know there are going to be more and more challenges,
but I'm glad I found my interests and passion.
Friday, May 11, 2012
My communication studies
As for my plan towards
completing my bachelor communication studies, I've already met with an advisor
and came out with the whole progress. Since I already completed all my lower
general education courses, all I have to do is to complete the upper general
education courses on my major. And in order to complete communication studies,
I need to complete six class from three different area, the F, P, I area and
several other classes. I already finished both P and F area from last and this
semester. Now I only need to complete two of the I, inquiry, courses then I'm
done with the requirement. Although I'm on track of the major courses, I'm still
lacked of the SJSU studies which is total of 12 units. And those are the last
few units I need to take before my graduation on 2013 spring!
Monday, April 30, 2012
What's good about my department?
Being a transfer student in San Jose State University,
this is only my second semester on campus. In terms of other functions like
equipment or building, I didn't find any difference compare to other
department. It is the professor that I believe is the biggest advantage I have
for choosing this major. So far I've had 5 professors teaching communication
studies. I must say they're a lot better than the courses I had when I was in
the community college. There are three advantages I found throughout all five
classes; close relationship with professor, practical theory, well organized
course schedule.
I've never had problem making appointment and meet up
with the professor to discuss my questions regarding the course. And I was
really impressed when every professor could remember my name in the week of the
class; even more, I'm still keep in contact with two of my professors; one of
them kindly provided me an internship opportunity for working in Nokia corporation!
As for the course itself, most of the course I've taken
are very useful in term of daily basis. These theories are not only for
research, but you can actually apply the methods when interacting with people
around you or when dealing with interpersonal issues. I like this because most
of the time the only chance you could ever use what you've learned in the class
is if you are working in that particular field. But for communication studies,
as long as you are not isolated from humanity, everything you learn in the
class can be useful in your daily life.
The third advantage is that each class I've had, they all
have a very organized schedule. Because I'm not a self-motivated student, often
I need a schedule to help me up to date for the current assignments of my
classes. Having a clear schedule makes it much easier for me to keep on track
for my study. It's also easier to determine your current grade since you know
clearly how many homework you've turned in or missed.
Students with disabilities
Although
I didn't get to say much in the discussion, the article "Communicating in
and Through "Murderball": Masculinity and Disability in Wheelchair
Rugby" made me thought a lot of the process of treating disability people differently
from when I was in Junior high school and nowadays. When I was studying junior
high school, I can barely remember seeing any disability students not only in
my but all other classes. I'm not sure how my school dealt with children with
physical disabilities, but I do remember there was a particular class for students
with mental disabilities.
There were two classes of mental disability students. Separated
from other classes, these two classes had their own building along with the
computer lab and other lab research facilities. I believe the reason of the
separation was to allow these special need students having enough space since
they are different. Yet the separation in my opinion also isolated these
students from interacting with others. Therefore many students in my class
don't even know how to have a regular conversation with a student with disabilities,
not even mentioning to provide help to him or her. I also don't recall having
any lectures from my teachers teaching us how to have a correct perception to
disability people, thus, some students chose to avoid them to escape from the awkwardness,
some students made fun of them, rarely you see students approach them to have a
decent conversation or offer some help. I was curious and went to ask my father
if there was any different with my generation than my father's generation in
terms of facing these disability students. Turns out he had exactly the same
experience with me that he could barely see kids with disability because
they've all been separated to another class.
I know that sometimes these students are different than
us, but in my opinion I don't think the school should just split them up with
other students and isolate them in a different place or building. Instead, I
think the better way to approach it, discussion like we have in the classroom
might not be realistic, is to have teachers teaching the students the correct
ways to interact with disability students. Although I know it's hard to teach
junior high students to understand and even accept the differences in between,
but this is a necessary lesson that all the students must learn when they're
young. Or how would they be able to accept other people with different race,
perspectives?
Mythical Norm
During chapter 4, I was really
interested at the concept of the "mythical norm." I like how the
textbook defines this particular term, that is, "a metaphor for those who
occupy positions of power in society; they are "the norm" or even
average or typical is a myth.(Warren & Fassett p.68) Volunteering in the
youth of Asian churches both in Taiwan and America, I constantly have to struggle
with the strong perception also pressure from Asian community. I believe different
cultures have different "mythical norm." One of the mythical norms
for Asian community is the high academic achievement. It's good to have an environment
to encourage you and motive you to pursue higher education, but it's a whole
different story when the motivation is driven by negative pressures.
A lot of
time in Asian society, although it's true that the higher education you
achieve, the more information you will learn, lower education equals failure
and disappointment. When I say lower education, I mean not only if you didn't
go to college but also if you went to a "lower ranked" college. When
serving in the church with young people, this is one of the issue I have to
deal with when helping especially high school students in my small group. They
constantly being pressured by their parents to pursue a "better"
college such as Stanford, Berkeley, Harvard, etc. And the fact is not everyone
can go to a school like that for people have different strength beside
studying! Yet I often find my group members having low-self confidence because
of the schools they're from are not in the list of the "good"
college. Of course there are people who have a different perspective such as my
parents that people should be developed in a way that will help they to pursue
their best interests and strength; however, the mythical norm still remains
with a common perception that you're not considered successful unless you have
great academic achievement.
I have tried to explain to many parents about this
issue because this perspective not only is hurting the students, but also the
relationship between the parents and their children. Interesting enough, by
resisting this negative perception, another mythical norm was formed among a
fair amount students. The perspective on this new group is exactly the opposite,
that is, you will be fine as long as you're happy with what you're doing. Personally
I don't agree with neither groups, because I believe as long as you've tried
your best, you're successful no matter what you've accomplished. As for now I
haven't found a way to solve the conflicts between these two groups, but
there're some improvements of the communication between parents and the
students. Hope someday someone will come out a better answer for both sides.
Tuesday, March 13, 2012
FGC - cultural shock
"First Generation College Student" to be honest that when the first time I heard this term, the picture in my mind was the generation of my parents(maybe even earlier) who first time had a chance to get a higher education. To me the FGC shouldn't exist in the student of my age; the reason is of the country and the society I grew up with. I moved from Taiwan to California, US for only 4 years ago; thus, a lot of my values are still based on where I grew up, Taiwan, and how I look at college education is one of them. In Taiwan, although the country has been white washed in many perspectives, yet it's still have some decent traditional Asian values. To Asian people, college education has become period of life that it's not your choice to accept it or not but a necessary process that one has to go through. When I was in high school, almost all my classmates, despite their GPA performances, are planning to continue their education. Before I left Taiwan 4 years ago, I remembered seeing an interesting news on TV, that is, the acceptance of college in that particular year went up to 103%! Of course not every college in Taiwan can be considered "good college", yet the concept of "you have to go to college" has become part of student's duty no matter if you're doing good in the school or not. When I saw so many classmates in the class today that raised their hand because they are FGC, I was in a cultural shock. If I've never left Taiwan and immigrated to the State, I don't think I would ever imagine or believe this.
The Differences
Similar to the research that has been done on the family rituals article I found for the paper analysis, I've observed an interesting phenomena in my Asian church. I'm in charge of the youth in the church. And there are two major groups of young people, FOB(fresh off the boat) and ABC(American born Chinese). For quite a while I kept having trouble letting two groups talk to each other or get together. Because I wanted to break the gap between these groups, so I started to find their similarities and differences. After couple months I finally realized one of the major causes of their separation, it was their cultural differences. Although they're all Chinese, a ABC has a very different character compare to a FOB who grew up in Asia. Some people call ABC "banana"; the reason is that even though they look like Chinese, their way thinking or acting are more similar toward white culture. And because they grew up speaking English, young ABCs, like other Americans, often having trouble accepting people who don't have fluent English. Therefore, ABCs tend to separate with FOBs in a group. As for FOBs, since their cultural aspects are inherited from the traditional Chinese society, many of them have the intendancy of staying with their own community, and they don't consider ABC as part of their group. Because of these reasons, ABC and FOB are having hard time entering each other's circle.
Sunday, February 26, 2012
Blog 2
The discussion of the reaction of people in sport events was really interesting; it reminded me of the experience I had when visiting Germany during the World Cup. I was able to find the differences of sport fans between US and Europe. The first thing I found differently was the numbers of sports that people are interested in sports. In the State we have various of sports that hold a solid fan base such as basketball, baseball, football, or tennis, etc. But in Germany (people there told me other European countries have the similar situation), people are focused only on several specific sports. And judging by the reaction that I observed during the sport events, I think European people have a stronger emotional attachment to sports they love than American. World Cup is one of the perfect example to support my assumption. During the World Cup specially when it was Germany V.S. Britain, I couldn't find anyone on the street in a 30 minute walk because everyone was at home watching the game. Also when I was watching the game with couple Germans, their reaction when the team made the first goal felt like the same reaction when American saw Armstrong walking on the moon. Even though they didn't curse, the emotions and the physical reactions they showed during the game made me really uncomfortable. I've been watching sport event with several people in the State who are really involved as a fan. Yet never I've seen such a extreme reactions compare to European sport fans.
Tuesday, February 7, 2012
COMM 101 entry
Although due to modern technology exposure that my generation has been trough, young people nowadays are heavily relied on electronic communication devices; however, I am not familiar with any types of blogs simply because of the fact that I am better at interacting with people face to face than expressing my thoughts through writing. Yet recently I have experienced more positive advantages of blogging. So I wish this blog will not only become part of the course work in this COMM 101 class, but also the beginning of the journey of blogging for me~
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)